ReviseAlgo Logo

Objects & Interfaces

Interface vs Type Alias — When to Use Which

Master comparing TypeScript interfaces vs type aliases, declaration merging, union types, performance differences, and architectural selection guidelines.

Last Updated: July 29, 2026 10 min read

TypeScript provides two core tools to name custom shapes and types: interface and type alias. While they overlap in 80% of use cases, key differences determine which tool is best suited for your architectural needs.

1. Syntax Comparison for Object Shapes

Both interface and type can define object structures:

2. Key Differences

1. Declaration Merging (Interfaces Only)

Interfaces with the same name in the same scope automatically merge their property declarations. Type aliases throw a duplicate identifier error.

2. Unions & Primitives (Type Aliases Only)

Type aliases can name primitive types, union types, tuple types, and mapped types directly. Interfaces cannot.

3. Extending & Combining

  • Interfaces extend other interfaces using extends.
  • Type aliases combine types using Intersection Types (&).
  • 3. Interactive Code Playground

    Compare interface vs type in practice:

    4. Selection Decision Matrix

    Capability / Requirementinterfacetype Alias
    Object Shapes & Class ContractsRecommendedSupported
    Declaration MergingYes (Built-in)No
    Primitive / Union / Tuple TypesNoYes (type ID = string \number)
    Extending / Inheritance SyntaxextendsIntersections (&)
    Performance (Compiler Caching)Slightly Faster for flat objectsFlexible
    Public API / Library ExportsRecommended for consumer extensibilityRecommended for complex utility types

    5. Best Practice Guidelines

    1. Use interface for Object Shapes & Public APIs: When defining object contracts, React component props, or library interfaces that external consumers might need to extend or augment via declaration merging. 2. Use type for Unions, Primitives & Mapped Types: When defining union types (string | number), tuples, function signatures, or mapped/conditional utility types.